mixed_biscuits
_________________________
fingers crossed
But that's clearly what he was saying - you may disagree with the entire medical establishment and think the vaccine makes you ill, but Biden hasn't suddenly switched positions has he?Rather than your 17-year natural coronavirus immunity, bolstered by contact with other variants, you have short-lived immunity from an unlicensed vaccine...great.
I agree with the point about the BBC. I think Labour has been calling for more action against vaccine deniers.
This government is obsessed with an artificial debate about free speech (mostly in connection with universities) and has been for years. But the fact that there is a precedent in the Cancer Act is interesting and should make them more comfortable with legislating on this.
Impracticable and selective: there are hundreds of academic papers on associations between various vaccines and nefarious effects.
I can't remember the exact figures, but I read recently that the rates of deaths or serious adverse reactions are about a hundred times higher for antibiotics than they are for most types of vaccine, yet for some reason there is no anti-antibiotic movement.do vaccines help more people than they hurt? what are the percentages, positive vs negative? I don't know, do you?
there are always going to be some adverse side effects for every drug, it's a matter of good/bad ratio. if a vaccine works for a vast majority but has some ill effect for a very small minority, would you be in favor of its use? or do you take the position that no one should take it unless it's proven 100% effective?