we need shorter names for you two. constant escape, you are now Stan. i can't keep typing constant escape every time. there's too many letters. suspended reason i havent got one for you yet.
The drake essay makes the same point very wellMark Fisher:
[Depressive ontology] is, after all and above all, a theory about the world, about life. [...] Depression[‘s]… difference from mere sadness consists in its claims to have uncovered The (final unvarnished) Truths about life and desire… there’s no point, everything is a sham. [...] A student of mine wrote in an essay recently that they sympathise with Schopenhauer when their football team loses. But the true Schopenhauerian moments are those in which you achieve your goals, perhaps realise your long-cherished heart’s desire—and feel cheated, empty, no, more—or is it less?—than empty, voided. Joy Division always sounded as if they had experienced one too many of those desolating voidings, so that they could no longer be lured back onto the merry-go-round. They knew that satiation wasn’t succeeded by tristesse, it was itself, immediately, tristesse. [D]epressive ontology is dangerously seductive because, as the zombie twin of Spinozist dispassionate disengagement, it is half true. As the depressive withdraws from the vacant confections of the Lifeworld, he unwittingly finds himself in concordance with the human condition so painstakingly diagrammed by Spinoza: he sees himself as a serial consumer of empty simulations, a junky hooked on every kind of deadening high, a meat puppet of the passions. The depressive cannot even lay claim to the comforts that a paranoiac can enjoy, since he cannot believe that the strings are being pulled by any One. No flow, no connectivity in the depressive’s nervous system. It is a ‘dry brain’ (Eliot) condition.
I wish I had a good answer to this, but it's A) thermodynamics, which was never my strong suit, and B) verging on chemistry, which isn't even a proper science.@suspendedreason @Mr. Tea any thoughts on Gibbs free energy? What exactly does it mean? Feel free to take a philosophic approach, which is my usually tactic for breaking into this stuff.
@luka heres a deleuze podcast for you: Deleuze and Guattari Quarantine Club - The Garden of Forking Paths. As if the literature wasn't tricky enough, here's a bunch of guys throwing around Deleuzian terminology about it.
link?The drake essay makes the same point very well
I ask myself the same question whenever I log in.how can you stand listening to these rambling stoners?
Submit to it. Let the jargon wash over you. As for what is underneath the jargon - we talk about that stuff all the time here.how can you stand listening to these rambling stoners?
it's not the jargon that bothers me. it's being in the company of a bunch of baggy trousered stoners. i wouldnt be surpirsed if some of them have got long hair. degenerates. they need to practice semen retention. get a bit of focus and energy back.
If ska-punk and Skrillex-style "dubstep" had a baby...
I don't believe the people in the podcast ever mentioned what, if anything, deleuze had to say about it (Not sure even how the lives of Deleuze and Borges overlap). They really just analyzed the text, occasionally utilizing deleuzian concepts (EG the labyrinth as rhizomatic, which is debatable. One of the guys just tossed that word out there, willy nilly).