I didn't say some of them weren't quite amusing!You see, this is exactly why I blocked your snark
Absolutely. If the incident at the Capitol wasn't orchestrated with this in mind, it'll certainly be taken advantage of in service of it.Unfortunately Biden's law will be used against BLM, ANTIFA etc as much as if not more than the fash.
This makes him sound like a small child that got murdered.Unfortunately Biden's law will be used against BLM, ANTIFA etc as much as if not more than the fash.
I think that's right Stan but people here are very sensitive to any hint of racism, which is a good thing. It's one of the good things about dissensus but it's also one of the things which I think should allow us to use a term like globalist on the understanding that we don't mean the Jews
Yes, and Patty was only talking about the Rothschild family.
I was just arguing that the only meaningful contingency that leads anywhere but globalism/international-capitalism/techno-feudalism would necessarily involve a reactionary, more or less fascist coup, which is a strong statement that doesn;t have enough backing it up. But as a point of departure, it may be useful, and usually that is what i;m going for: what can further our understanding?I don't follow your logic here though. Why a reactionary fascist coup exactly?
Do you remember what you said about WW2 re: Gravity's Rainbow? I think that's the approach you should take to this.I think that's right Stan but people here are very sensitive to any hint of racism, which is a good thing. It's one of the good things about dissensus but it's also one of the things which I think should allow us to use a term like globalist on the understanding that we don't mean the Jews
Ww2 is a founding myth of the modern world. It props up the Empire. If you can attack it without giving the slightest inch, succour, wink to Nazis, I think it's worth doing.
Even you.Yeah but everyOne asked him to stop!
You're right, and I'm not trying to change that. Part of my difficulty here is just that I wasn;t even aware the word so widely carried this connotation - and it makes sense why it does, I just think its a mistake to apply that degree of skepticism to every usage of the word.I think that's right Stan but people here are very sensitive to any hint of racism, which is a good thing. It's one of the good things about dissensus but it's also one of the things which I think should allow us to use a term like globalist on the understanding that we don't mean the Jews