Thinking about a new breed of businessperson, technologically enabled to be more transparent, in the spirit of the triple bottom line.
What would be some consequences of having an executive of a company, a person, be radically monitored and supervised, in 99% of their life doings, by a contingency of shareholders or people otherwise effected by these business decisions?
I'm thinking a more throughly public life than even most of our celebrities, maybe even going as far as public/livestreamed therapy sessions, letting shareholders into the head of the executive, and how such arrangements can be "cryptographically guaranteed" by some smart contract architecture.
There have been some gimmicky examples of this, such as certain influencer/micro-influencers who let fans govern certain life decisions by way of governance tokens, i.e. crypto.
If we are to get past single bottom line motivation, I think something needs to change radically about how we go about high-stakes business, and what degree of discretion is left to executives. Certainly there must remain pockets of privacy and discretion, or else one's strategy may be disintegrated, but I think having a public record of, what 95% of one's personal expenditures may be a step forward, and would require a sort of gracious sociopath to accept such terms.