Definitely, I follow that logic and I agree with it. That the power of humans in powerful offices, public or private, reduces down to their ability to restructure societal systems that ways that they favor.as long as you understand "political" to mean "institutional" to mean "operational"
i have sympathy for this view- the powers that b can make the dream impossible. stranger things have happened tho. i mean we literally have socialist states inspired by a two guys writingscrypto is impossible, imo
you've confused me here. in what sense is the politicla the operationalas long as you understand "political" to mean "institutional" to mean "operational"
Here, the restructuring itself can be more transparent, while also being opaque qua technically dense - but then what is law?Definitely, I follow that logic and I agree with it. That the power of humans in powerful offices, public or private, reduces down to their ability to restructure societal systems that ways that they favor.
I took that to mean that political power reduces down to operational, practical power, power to tilt the table, to write the rules, to influence operational reality.you've confused me here. in what sense is the politicla the operational
Imagine if law itself was programmatic and publicly queryable.Here, the restructuring itself can be more transparent, while also being opaque qua technically dense - but then what is law?
I took that to mean that political power reduces down to operational, practical power, power to tilt the table, to write the rules, to influence operational reality.
And if changes to it depended on on-chain events like governance votes.Imagine if law itself was programmatic and publicly queryable.
don't say evil thingsobvs crypto markets are possible, but they will be completely captured by finance