mixed_biscuits
_________________________
If there were 20 more Lukas they'd all be queuing up for his poems.
Fact is most of the poets who put structure in the background do so because they're not technically able enough to be more formal, and then this lack of structure may itself be foregrounded ending in pure sloppinessThe archaic forms seem to induce many poets into using archaic language (perhaps because those forms were initially evolved in an era of "whereto"s etc.).
I can see the appeal, too, since a huge chunk of the best poetry written was written in those forms. But the forms are exhausted.
Also it's very hard to write formally structured verse, especially spreading sentences out over stanzas, that don't use filler words/redundancies/clunky rhymes/convoluted grammar, etc.
English is rhyme poor, which is one of the factors that probably made free verse inevitable.
I wonder if something like this applies in the case of rap music, too, where the constriction of rhyming Line A with Line B meant rap had to evolve out of that straightforward "bars" mode?
So Luka is agreeing with me in saying that you should try to write it yourself.he doesnt have anything to say cos hes never thought about it or worked at it thats why pound says if you want to know about poetry ask a poet, don't ask biscuits
yeah that is actually the difficulty of giving advice cos often it boils down to be like me.I think his values boil down to 'you have to be Luka'
IDK he seemed to have spent the last 20 minutes posting hundreds of words about what poetry should aspire to, and I haven't seen a single gesture from you, not even a trolling gesture, pretty weak IMO.I think his values boil down to 'you have to be Luka'