Leo

Well-known member
That's because I'm on medication that messes with my concentration. I thought I'd told the forum this? But maybe I hadn't.

fine, but then just post a new comment. when you edit or delete past posts, it makes people on the other side of the discussion look like they've ignored the new bits or reacting to something that doesn't exist.
 

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
here's one then: back in January, when I first got into it with you about the constant, petty and personal needling across various threads directed at me from yourself, and I foolishly rose to the bait, you then DM'd me to apologise for being a bit hard on me. I told you I wouldn't accept the apology because it was active and sustained and I had no interest in being part of it. You told me to "suit myself" and since then you've been even more venomous, with weird attempts at anti-Scottish discrimination and homophobia (oh but you're not straight). If you were sincere in thinking you'd been combative and unnecessary, and you had any sense of genuine contrition around it, you wouldn't be doubling down on the antagonising. What you want, is to be able to throw insults and -viciousness around with impunity, and the fact I won't let you away with that when it's aimed at me is something you don't like.

I like how you're conveniently ignoring the fact that you were obsessed with calling me a nihilist with no care for suffering when I exposed your racist attachment to the labour party and white guilt anti-war marches. Because that's what it is, pseudo-actionism conveniently snuggled into a box of pseudo-reality. Whether you were a naive teenager is irrelevant here, it's about a realistic assessment. You overegged your subjectivity for a boilerplate anti-tory starmer is still better than them! without even thinking that my arguments justify historical investigation. If you don't want people to throw bigotry your way then simply don't engage in infantalising bigotry yourself. Yeah I was homophobic towards you, so what. I'm not always going to play the better man when some randomer does everything to negate my outlook on the world. You also aren't in solidarity with people like me, much as you would kid yourself, ('but I'm antagonistic to heteronormative society') as if! so it's hardly as if you can be accused of being immaculate here.
 
Last edited:

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
fine, but then just post a new comment. when you edit or delete past posts, it makes people on the other side of the discussion look like they've ignored the new bits or reacting to something that doesn't exist.

fine, but Craner and Barty did it all the time, so not sure why Boxed is doubling down on that as if I'm some colossal rule breaker.
 

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
Im willing to apologise to the forum for calling boxed a 'faggot' but that necessitates that he acknowledge that he was engaging in racialised thinking by discounting my political perspectives because they didn't fit into the framework of the 'good coloured' persons.

That's all I ask. Mutual reciprocity. Cos I'm getting tired of this near stalkerish obsession.
 

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
I ignore him, he ignores me, no problem. But he's got it into his head I've called him a sex offender. If this isn't a blatant move to push me off the forum then I can't work out what it is. Either way its poorly executed.
 

Leo

Well-known member
fine, but Craner and Barty did it all the time, so not sure why Boxed is doubling down on that as if I'm some colossal rule breaker.

to beat a dead horse, I was remarking on your editing and deleting posts here, a little earlier.

ok, no more from me on this topic. I didn't mean to stir the pot.
 

boxedjoy

Well-known member
I saw the tweet at the time, a clear link was made beyond mere insinuation and I should have screenshotted it at the time.

there's threads that don't make sense as they are, without attempting to mute those non-sequitur diversions and personal hobbyhorses.

everything about this pseudo-racism I've alleged to have taken part in (by saying, what, I think Labour are the weak best of a truly bad bunch? by going on an antiwar march in my teens without having the sophisticated nuance of deep political thought and real lived-in experience?). It's not the same as sustained pointed trolling or directly telling someone they're "a faggot with no dick" - that's not someone missing an understanding of historic imperialism and its consequences (which is exactly where I'm at fault), that's just direct unpleasantness.

anyway I don't think this worth wasting any more of my own mental energy on, I think I'll just fuck off back to ILM, they might not have 2-step tunes or politically horizon-expanding debates, but it was never as unpleasant.
 

version

Well-known member
Third taking issue with you over the Labour thing struck me as a bit arbitrary as I'm sure others on here have expressed something similar re: them being the lesser of two evils.

I dunno enough about the politics to really parse the arguments, but I had a similar feeling re: the stuff with Xenogothic. I couldn't see a reason for the dispute getting as heated as it did.
 

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
I saw the tweet at the time, a clear link was made beyond mere insinuation and I should have screenshotted it at the time.

Again, not my problem you can't back it up. So it's still slander. Innocent until proven guilty, etc.

everything about this pseudo-racism I've alleged to have taken part in (by saying, what, I think Labour are the weak best of a truly bad bunch? by going on an antiwar march in my teens without having the sophisticated nuance of deep political thought and real lived-in experience?). It's not the same as sustained pointed trolling or directly telling someone they're "a faggot with no dick" - that's not someone missing an understanding of historic imperialism and its consequences (which is exactly where I'm at fault), that's just direct unpleasantness.

Being called a 'faggot with no dick' is still preferable to having the consequences of reactionary religious regimes and communities shoved down your throat daily. You can talk about gay men who refuse to out themselves being self-hating all you like, but you have no idea what your ignorance (and many labourites for that matter) of historical imperialism allows to slip by. If that makes me mean and insensitive, then sure, guilty as charged. As for labour being the worst of a bad bunch, that's patently false, this is just another white leftist lie. We don't see it like that. That's all I tried to say to you, that the lesser evilist dichotomy makes sense to people invested in a very white, parochial leftism. Something you're unwilling to acknowledge, because for you the tories are the fount of all evil, and this allows you to turn a side eye to labourist homophobia (which ironically increased in our communities during the new labour years) and sponsoring of reactionist communitarian leaders (which are of course highly patriarchal and homophobic) - a policy Blair was enacting long before the Iraq war. We all did stupid things as teenagers, but I'm mature enough to acknowledge them, whereas you seem incapable of. You want muslims and middle easteners to treat you nicely without being malicious, whilst you don't offer them the same courtesy. You are unwilling to acknowledge that any so-called decolonisation is going to be violent, and will hurt many things that white people hold sacred, including their facade of parliaments.

anyway I don't think this worth wasting any more of my own mental energy on, I think I'll just fuck off back to ILM, they might not have 2-step tunes or politically horizon-expanding debates, but it was never as unpleasant.

Again, I haven't engaged with you for months, so don't try to play the chivalrous card here.

As for ILM, if you want a monothought academic clique then sure, go back there.
 
Last edited:

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
Third taking issue with you over the Labour thing struck me as a bit arbitrary as I'm sure others on here have expressed something similar re: them being the lesser of two evils.

I dunno enough about the politics to really parse the arguments, but I had a similar feeling re: the stuff with Xenogothic. I couldn't see a reason for the dispute getting as heated as it did.

Because it's a dishonest lie.
 

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
You need to demonstrate how labour are the lesser of two evils compared to the tories. And liberals can't do that, because they are coloured by their own self-hatred of the tory toffs.

If anyone can convincingly demonstrate that labour can genuinely act as outsiders to the status quo, then I'll recant my views on the lesser evil dichotomy being entirely false. But telling me that the left of the party doesn't have the power to confront the right is a cop out of the highest order. They decide still to remain affiliated to it, they don't split and cause it problems, all they ever do is act as a loyal opposition. Corbyn was an anti-war backbencher! So what? He should have left the bloody thing when they invaded Iraq. That's how you exercise political pressure.
 

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
There is no such thing as opposition within political parties. This is how Rosa Luxemburg was murdered, after all. She could only be a real opposition when she broke with the SDP and became a genuine threat. Corbyn was not a threat to the ruling classes whatsoever, he was a threat to the salaries of people who make lucrative amounts through being in opposition. Labour actually achieving power would tank all those think tanks, academics, oppositional mps.

It's why the biggest threat for instance to people who write about the injustice of immigration and closed borders is to actually open borders. It always pays better to be in opposition within the gradiants that the parliamentary system self-determines.
 

version

Well-known member
Fair enough.

I used to see them as the lesser of two evils, but now I just don't like either party. I think I may have more disdain for Labour atm because I used to expect more of them than I did the Tories.

It's the same when I look across the pond. I've never liked the GOP, but I get much more wound up by the Democrats atm due to suddenly becoming aware of just how cynical and dishonest they can be after having watched the Trump and COVID fallout.
 

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
I dunno that all this justifies how nasty the dispute with boxedjoy got though.

No, and I'm willing to admit that I got cuntish there. But I expect him to acknowledge that he was also treating me like an infantile basket case who had nothing valid to say. I'm not going to act as a foil for anyones civilised absolution. I'm willing to put this all behind and never interact with him ever again, but he was dredging it all up, needlessly.
 
Top