chava
Well-known member
In the eyes of the US libertarian right wing, yes. Recently the Swedish argued against the use of masks because "not everyone can afford them".
Wuhan Killer Sneeze (thanks Tea)
- Thread starter HMGovt’s Glorious Return!
- Start date
-
- Tags
- "the delta variant" starring arnold schwarzenegger #braille4bats and dancing!!! biscuits nuts bodies in the streets cool people with bad lungs corpsey = patient zero do you ever look at this thread and wtf get pits done haha protein printer go brrr i'm trapped please help johnson’s technique please boris die public health films for bats rodent trumpet rotting corpses sailing the sea of biscuits slick prick soggy biscuits wash hands or die trying we are the swarm wear a fucking baguette then wubonic plague wuhan got you all in check
- Status
Leo
Well-known member
But their approach seems to have been less than successful health-wise as well: "Last week Sweden’s total coronavirus death count crossed 7,000. Neighboring Denmark, Finland and Norway, all similar-sized countries, have recorded since the start of the pandemic 878, 415 and 354 deaths respectively."
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
Are you sure about that? That's an incredibly stupid attitude, if it's what they actually said. Disposable masks costs literally pennies each when bought in bulk, and even washable cloth masks are still only a few pounds/euro, and that's at public retail prices. Sweden is a wealthy country with a well-funded welfare state. I have a hard time believing they'd prefer thousands of avoidable hospitalizations for the sake of saving a few million kroner on free masks.
Ivor Cummins has produced another video, the latest data further debunking lockdowns
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Sweden suddenly rolling out wholesale changes to policy is fake news. Their second wave is on the wane anyway, just like most other European countries.
@Mr. Tea There is no evidence whatsoever that masks prevent 'thousands of hospitalisations.' That's why SAGE's summary of their uses is still 'weak evidence of a small effect'
@Mr. Tea There is no evidence whatsoever that masks prevent 'thousands of hospitalisations.' That's why SAGE's summary of their uses is still 'weak evidence of a small effect'
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Anti-science lockdown dopes should be grateful that we didn't lock down early enough to suppress the virus much cos otherwise we would be staring down the barrel of utter despair right now.
WashYourHands
Cat Malogen
Like Italy and Spain then.
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
If you can't see what lockdowns do (ie. exactly what Ferguson told us they would do, in March) by now, you're a lost cause.
That's right: cases are decreasing in Italy and Spain and the death rate will follow.
WashYourHands
Cat Malogen
But they’re on their twelftieth waves.
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
They're on their 'second waves' ie. the mopping-up of those left from the first wave, prompted by a seasonal nudge.
WashYourHands
Cat Malogen
I can’t see the packaging for the biscuits
Leo
Well-known member
so everything and every health official in that Wall Street Journal story is wrong?
IdleRich
IdleRich
I can see what no lockdown and no masks is doing in the US.
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
And then you've got the collateral damage of lockdowns too:
WashYourHands
Cat Malogen
The only winner is Bezos. Might as well be arguing about stone.
Leo
Well-known member
did you even read that WSJ article? the facts of Sweden's increasing and significantly higher death rate -- 10x more than neighboring countries with similar sized populations -- and rapidly filling hospitals completely contradicts your unsourced graphs. look at the first chart in the WSJ article, deaths have dramatically increased in the past month or two.
you seem to ignore inconvenient facts and redirect focus elsewhere.
- Status