Of course any global standard has to include prejudices and a brutal flattening out... but that's (sort of) what universal means. Were you talking about Borges? Funes the Memorious when he creates his own number system of completely unique numbers and it's great but it's totally insane cos no-one else can use it. Yes prejudice is built into everything... there is no neutral... and yet, I'd like to be able to find what I want and I'm glad someone tried.
Like with the mercator projection (speaking of flattening out) - and people think it's racist cos it makes the African countries look small or whatever... but it's just the way to do it if you want to navigate using latitude and longitude. It kinda grates with me when people get on that one.
well it's all about achieving that Aristotelian balance innit. But yes, i take your point and like I've said to Rich, it's probably a pointless argument for me to make within this thread. But there's a wider issue...Yes, this is the argument against structure that the pro-flux queer demo pushes. Nelson's Argonauts epitomizes it.
Yes, systems have bias, because a system reflects an ontology, and ontologies reside, in part, in the eyes of the observer. "In part" because there are structural distinctions and real, formal patterns in nature—there's a meaningful difference between a plant and an animal that will get picked up cross-culturally—but at the same time, people taxonomize to fulfill pragmatic purposes, based on their own subjective understandings of the world. The system is an instrument based on an understanding of the problem-space, which is partly cultural.
This goes for language too, or binomial nomenclatures (speciation—which, any biologist will tell you, is basically constructed, rather than inherent). This goes for anything really, it's an inescapable law, it's definitional to what classification is. (Enter postmodernism.)
But the alternative to systems, as @IdleRich points out, is (obviously) no system. And "no system" is a really bad place to be. No basis for curation. No ability to classify or organize. No ability to speak or communicate! Nada, zilch, it's all out. The only real option is to improve on the system or suggest an alternative.
On alternative to seeing the system as constraining is to see it as enabling. Yes, it's imperfect, but it's far better than pure chaos, which is only "unbiased" so far as its "precognized."
I can get behind the idea of making library taxonomies more local, less standardized, so it can be adapted to the purpose at hand. (Note that many specialty, research and archival libraries already do this.) But note that comes with a tradeoff: they'll be less accessible to outsiders. C'est la vie—tailoring for locals is hostile to foreigners, another inescapable law.
Me too.been in denial for a while and still need to get my residence sorted so i can stay in deutschland. feck.
Well pound will devalue further I guess but also extra taxes may apply (Captain Kirk already stopped selling to UK for that reason) and tariffs etc And then reduction in choice so less competition equals higher prices.you mean products from outside the uk will get very expensive?
doing business with this bog country is not gonna be worth the effortWell pound will devalue further I guess but also extra taxes may apply (Captain Kirk already stopped selling to UK for that reason) and tariffs etc And then reduction in choice so less competition equals higher prices.
and the pound is gonna collapseWell pound will devalue further I guess but also extra taxes may apply (Captain Kirk already stopped selling to UK for that reason) and tariffs etc And then reduction in choice so less competition equals higher prices.
not gnne be much lego available post brexit, i guess it will become a recycling economy,You can build with Lego.