What Im curious about is who has in the flesh good conversations. Who reguarly sits for hours with a partner and does nothing but talk without any touch, movement, side activity involved
I have a friend who I talk on the phone with once or twice a month, the calls usually go over an hour and are pretty good, but of course the lack of physical proximity dredges up similar problems to those I enumerated above re: chat on Dissensus. That is, you have no access to the other person's life, facial reactions, what they're up to that day; they may not have set aside a buncha time to hang; you may both worry you're being a drain on the other's time; there's nothing but the talk, so it's hard to get relief, or alternate talk with breaks like pouring a drink, looking out the window, stroking the cat, putting on a new record. No central objects or reality to talk about and around, the way you can talk about a record or a drink or what's happening outside the window.
I had some of my best conversations traveling around Europe, with the notable exception of London. That was in large part from meeting new people, or finally meeting up IRL with long-time Internet acquaintances. But those conversations really fueled a lot of new thinking, a lot of new ideas and thoughts, in a way you maybe can't fully get online. Felt invigorating. Felt connected. Made me feel I was cutting myself off from a lot of life, being outside urban hubs like Berlin.
Intoxicants of course help lower boundaries, barriers, loosen grips, relax people.
Keeping good conversation with partners of many years is tough I think, you've covered so much already, you've explored so many of your divergences in thinking, and so many of even the discussions that are worth having have histories, can be sensitive, feel loaded with agendas or interpersonal dynamics, can't be entered neutrally.