No doubt Ms Moss actually is ugly compared to the harem of breathtaking beauties that you can call on for no-strings-attached rumpo on any night of the week, what with being the forum's premier alpha-male chadstud and all.
Over-reliance on dicktionary definitions is the very definition of phallogocentrism.
Someone clearly isn't familiar with their SI derivative units
It's funny how long we were all holding out from acknowledging it.
Ban him! Burn him!
If cisheterosexual men perform anti-phallic behavior, they are are queer and non-binary. Denying this misunderstands the fact that the gender binary only gives us the tools needed to recognize men who act masculine. The gender binary prohibits men from acting feminine, thus feminine men are non-binary. You don't understand how the gender binary actually works. Denying that feminine men subvert the gender binary amounts to denying that the gender binary supports the marginalization and under-representation of non-phallic culture.
No, I act like the marginalized, and for this I am marginalized. You think I've never been bullied or misunderstood for acting feminine? You think the dominant culture represents feminine men? It doesn't. You're the one saying, at every turn, that I shouldn't promote feminine culture. Everytime I try to express my femininity, you try to block it out. And you tell me I'm not marginalized? You've made an extensive effort to marginalize me.
All identities are performative. Identity = performance. It's called the performative theory of gender for a reason. And it doesn't undermine the identities I do represent. Why would it? I act non-binary to support non-binary people.
Yes, those material conditions are the behaviors that define the identity. Behaviors I practice. The gender binary refuses to allow us to understand feminine men, thus men who act feminine have non-binary gender identities.
I claim to be feminine because I act feminine. I do it for the sake of increasing and improving the representation of femininity in our culture. This bit about "performative wokeness" just comes from your failure to understand what gender actually is. You don't understand that promoting non-phallic culture is worth doing for its own sake, because you don't care about representing and promoting femininity. Again, it's a matter of empirical fact that I am feminine. I was feminine before I identified as a feminist. That's my character and I'm not going to change it.
It really doesn't. I've had to deal with near constant backlash for my feminine behavior, and while that's not the same as the struggles some non-binary people face, all feminine queers face marginalization for their non-phallic behavior. All non-binary people are underrepresented and misunderstood by mainstream society. Each particular identity group faces its own different struggles. But to deny that me and other non-binary people share any struggles in common is just insensitive.
People can't just say things and by doing so, change you gender. Your gender only changes if you behavior conforms to the norm that says what actions count as definitive of that gender. So if I want to change my gender from man to transwoman, a community must accept that I act like a transwoman, that rules that say how a transwoman acts regulate my behavior. There's no reason to believe others can change my identity just by talking. Only my behavior can change my identity.
If you think we can only understand people in biological terms, that's on you. To do culture theory, we need to understand people in cultural terms. Otherwise we reduce culture to biology. I reject reductionism, so I study culture as an autonomous phenomenon.
The community doesn't perceive any men as feminine. When men act feminine, the community perceives them as failed men. And "female" is a sex category, not a gender category. I'm only talking about gender here.
Oi, you snivellin' tosser. You reckon you're the bloke to lecture us on the state of 'ip 'op, do ya? Oi'd label you a bang-up example of ideological charlatanism, I would. You're standin' there, waggin' yer gob about phallocentrism in 'ip 'op as if y'read a couple books an' suddenly you're Malcolm bleedin' X.
Again, this idea that I'm only interested in feeling superior is an ad hominem attack. It shows that you are more interested in posturing than you are in feminine culture.
