I'd steer you away from a technical jacket unless you're going to be a) doing a lot of sweaty exercise and b) wearing technical baselayers and midlayers. Wearign a £300 Rab jacket over a cotton t-shirt and a hoodie is almost completely pointless.i'd steer you away from technical jackets sub 200 pounds
or if you insist on a tech jacket maybe go vintage like sierra designs 60/40 or old columbia or old patagonia or north face brown label
I'd steer you away from a technical jacket unless you're going to be a) doing a lot of sweaty exercise and b) wearing technical baselayers and midlayers. Wearign a £300 Rab jacket over a cotton t-shirt and a hoodie is almost completely pointless.
That said, for seriously warm I'd consider getting either a primaloft-insulated jacket or a waterproof down jacket. Non-waterproofed down jackets just get wet and useless, though. In both cases, PHD if I felt rich, Rab or Patagonia or Alpkit otherwise. But then, I'd be thinking of wearing it up mountains in the winter. For wearing around town I'd be happier with a pea coat or a crombie or something...
i know someone that is sitting on a lot of vexed generation stock that i could put you in touch with... probably could do you good for sub 200 pounds
Not that it's a bad thing, but I genuinely understood almost none of that. Who knew there was such variety on the coat front? What's a pea coat?
It's more that tech jackets full stop are a bit of a waste of time unless you're going up a mountain and wearing a full technical layering system. A lot of what you're paying for is a breathable fabric that'll let sweat out as well as not letting rain in. But if you're not going to be sweating a lot, that's not much of a benefit. And even if you are sweating a lot, if you're wearing a cotton T-shirt and a hoody or something under the jacket, they'll soak up the sweat and it still won't help.Hmmmm. I'm not really crazy about the duffle/peacoat look, and much prefer a lighter jacket. Are sub £200 tech jackets pretty much a waste of time?
kinda quite interested in this, vg did wicked stuff
It's more that tech jackets full stop are a bit of a waste of time unless you're going up a mountain and wearing a full technical layering system. A lot of what you're paying for is a breathable fabric that'll let sweat out as well as not letting rain in. But if you're not going to be sweating a lot, that's not much of a benefit. And even if you are sweating a lot, if you're wearing a cotton T-shirt and a hoody or something under the jacket, they'll soak up the sweat and it still won't help.
Basically, if you buy a tech waterproof jacket for everyday wear, you're paying for 1) a well designed hood 2) a waterproof zip and 3) the looks and the brand name. Which is fair enough, I suppose, I just get irrationally wound up by people who buy a jacket designed for scottish winter climbing and only wear it to walk the dog around South Ken. It's the chelsea tractor of the jacket world.
A decent down or synthetic-fill insulated jacket makes a bit more sense, since it's basically very warm and very light. Down is a better insulator but fails completely if it gets wet, hence the usefulness of synthetic fill.
i'm ok for rain clothes in fall/winter, but not for warmer months when i tend to wear sneakers (aka, "trainers"). what sort of foot gear do you guys wear on a warm rainy day?
second would be good with a choker though. do you wear those ever? i think they're hot.