I posted that because it was just so ridiculous to suggest that the monarchy had some kind of hand in causing them all to happen. I understand their influence isn't literally zero, but to consider a counterfactual, how differently would the course of the last 70 years have turned out if the UK had become a republic in 1952? It's hardly as if a country needs a monarchy to engage in imperialism, colonialism, or general shitty behaviour, or oppress its own minorities, or to have an elite. Look at France, or the USA, or the USSR, or post-Soviet Russia, or China - all republics. And if we'd got rid of them, the same powerful interests would still exist. Our press would still be owned by the same Murdochs, Rothermeres, Barclays and Lebedevs. It would be symbolic step in the right direction, I think, but I don't share sufi's conviction that E-lizard-breath II was the world's primary agent of evil.