IdleRich
IdleRich
But you accepted those figures a minute ago when you thought they made your point...Massively incorrect.
But you accepted those figures a minute ago when you thought they made your point...Massively incorrect.
It's only "dodgy" in your head because you've dishonestly decided that a medicine is only "safe" if it has a serious side effect rate of 0.00000%, which no medicine has, as I'm sure you're aware.So you would rather we use a dodgy vaccine that we know will kill some people than just waiting for a properly approved vaccine?
Ooh Rich, I hate to say it, but I think he may have a point and is definitely much better at maths than your or me based on a weak, pedantic jibe about the technical meaning of the word "sum".'Sum' involves adding, Professor Fermat
Is this pedantic too? Or does it just mean I have standards?Ooh Rich, I hate to say it, but I think he may have a point and is definitely much better at maths than your or me based on a weak, pedantic jibe about the technical meaning of the word "sum".
Oh dang, you found a minor typo. That's definitely much more embarrassing than publicly failing Key Stage 2 maths. I shall hang my head in shame.Is this pedantic too? Or does it just mean I have standards?
I'm scared of a disease that could kill or disable me. By which I mean, I take reasonable precautions to avoid catching it, and expect others to do the same, while getting on with my life and hoping that a bunch of demented reactionary arseholes don't fuck it all up (again) and cause yet another lockdown (again).Yes, far, far too simple.
No wonder you're scared if you think that would happen
The phrase "harsh but fair" springs to mind.Wow the tags are pretty harsh
That, right there, sums it up perfectly. Why should I care about the IFR for anyone but myself, right?@Mr. Tea While you're busy being Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells, there is plenty that could kill or disable you but we don't turn the world over because of it. btw the IFR for people of your age is far, far lower than 1%