I wasn't being facetious.
To be fair, I wrote this in an academic reference for you, when I was trying to make a virtue of the fact you had no A-Levels. And then you got offended by it!
It's just way more engaging and inviting. Even the mystical rambling and exegetical indulgence. Even though I don't believe it or that it's not transformative in any way, it's still way more exciting than going through that map of references.What I appreciate most about the anti-intellectual nature of dissensus which Luka has alluded to is the way in which it provides a space to discuss our topics of interest free from the infection of the sneering, conceited attitude which the aforementioned intellectuals over on twitter seem dependent on in order to leverage their personal brands for maximum effect in terms of showing off, attracting more followers, and (ultimately) selling more books.
Pipe down, shiels.
lol you don't have the shared history, or (I'm pretty sure) the mad inspiration to pull off luka banterThey even have a whatsapp group about it, Dads Whatsapp
I thought we were mates again??
I can't speak for everyone but I'm pretty confident it was the rampant/petulant antagonism (no offense if you read that buddy, you know it's true)of the reasons why Third rubbed so many people up the wrong way on here