Why Conspiracy Theories?

[luka]

you could of just joined in with me there, ganged up on biscuits and had him confess that hes just the same as us. he goes with a vague gut instinct which is formed from a few news sources, his peers, and some random websites.

 

[mixed_biscuits]

@Mr. Tea This is from on high, from Merck's scripture; I am but a humble cleric.

 

[WashYourHands]

Dennis Quaid driving through your bloodstream Little Priest. Get into it.

 

[luka]

ive never come across anyone as thick as Tea hes the most thickest person on planet earth. its amazing that you can stumble through life for forty years with a brain that fucked. its a miracle. hes like one of those holy fools.

 

[IdleRich]

yeah its funny but bratty college kids pointing and laughing at the freaks is not really good is it

I think she's selling her own book.

 

[Mr. Tea]

you could of just joined in with me there, ganged up on biscuits and had him confess that hes just the same as us. he goes with a vague gut instinct which is formed from a few news sources, his peers, and some random websites.

It's more fun when we're all just screaming at each other and talking at cross-purposes though, isn't it?

 

[Mr. Tea]

Science-denier!

Category error here, mate. I'm not even talking about the science. I'm talking about the ethics of a health policy that would lead to huge numbers of people dying or being seriously injured because of some dodgy 19th century ideal of social Darwinism.

 

[yyaldrin]

mixed biscuit if you HAD to take a vaccine, which one would it be?

 

[luka]

It's more fun when we're all just screaming at each other and talking at cross-purposes though, isn't it?

no. its most fun when we all gang up on someone for a group bullying session. you could have joined in when i shouted bundle.

 

[mixed_biscuits]

mixed biscuit if you HAD to take a vaccine, which one would it be?

Oxford's I guess, as it's a trad vaccine rather than an mRNA novelty

 

[mixed_biscuits]

Category error here, mate. I'm not even talking about the science. I'm talking about the ethics of a health policy that would lead to huge numbers of people dying or being seriously injured because of some dodgy 19th century ideal of social Darwinism.

Sorry, a scientist said it and it's about science, you inveterate science-denier.

As Rio would say, you've been Mercked

 

[Mr. Tea]

Sorry, a scientist said it and it's about science, you inveterate science-denier.

As Rio would say, you've been Mercked

But you accept that, ceteris paribus, more people catching it would mean more people dying from it? I mean, that seems inevitable, right? What argument could possibly make that untrue?

Don't type a sentence that starts "Merck says..." - try engaging with what I'm actually saying here.

 

[mixed_biscuits]

I'm deferring to the scientists on this, as should you.

It's not up to us to divine their mysterious ways.

 

[pattycakes_]

Dennis Quaid driving through your bloodstream Little Priest. Get into it.

Better than Randy

 

[Mr. Tea]

I'm deferring to the scientists on this, as should you.

It's not up to us to divine their mysterious ways.

I feel like you're deliberately not getting the point.

 

[WashYourHands]

Better than Randy

Save Randy for the alien mothership

 

[version]

Revealed: Queen lobbied for change in law to hide her private wealth

Monarch dispatched private solicitor to secure exemption from transparency law

www.theguardian.com

 

[luka]

 

[WashYourHands]

MI5 and union interference (plus interference in much broader aspects of domestic political organisation) is hardly news

As for Anglo-Saxon common sense, for us in the north and west this is an older, inside joke again

Someone tweet that cunt a slap

 

[luka]

k-punk? hes dead. no more slaps for him, sorry.