Going it alone

Woebot

Well-known member
It seems like checks and balances are important, and that bands or projects with multiple voices on creative input can outcompete solo projects. But on the other hand, too much workshopping (too many cooks) and you get MFA-syndrome: bland, personality-less.

This holds true especially with Dance music and Electronica. In the old days gear was pooled - no-one owned everything. That was one factor. The Black Dog was three people bickering - Turner/Handley/Downie - all three of them had to be happy with a record.

The old jungle twelve releases - often crews of people - Dego/Marc Mac/Goldie. Foul Play - Morrow/Bradshaw/Gurley. Omni Trio - Haigh/Playford.

In the old rock eco-system big groups of people made music. The best example being the Beatles - John, Paul, George and Ringo - even Billy Preston yes. But also George Martin, Geoff Emerick, Phil Macdonald, Alan Parsons...
 

version

Well-known member
I would agree that Madonna is a bit like Bowie but within a narrower spectrum and with far fewer good tunes. But that's how everything works, you get a pale imitation (of Bowie's imitation) and then a bit later you get Gaga as a paler yet imitation of Madonna.
You've also got Marilyn Manson appearing between Madonna and Gaga and taking a lot of cues from Bowie.
 

Leo

Well-known member
from Discogs comments on "Tin Machine II"

I do recall Ferry was pissed when Bowie rushed out his album of cover tunes "Pin-Ups" after Ferry told him that was what he [Ferry] was working on - a covers album - "These Foolish Things". Apparently this added some "fuel" to Mick Jagger's famous snark, "Never wear a new pair of shoes in front of David."
 

Leo

Well-known member
one last Tin Machine point: always loved how drummer and bassist Hunt and Tony Sales are sons of Soupy Sales. They played with Iggy as well, on his Berlin albums with David.
 

luka

Well-known member
stay in your lane straight white people or he'll come for you!

yeah, i see what you're saying. quite interesting. i suppose we think as straight white people (me and you and padraig and the rest of us) what we might permit ourselves to do or forbid ourselves to do. eg i wouldnt rap. but also the idea that Bowie, used queerness and black music feels a bit reductive here and the implied ethics feels dangerous.
 

entertainment

Well-known member
i'm not a big fan of the exploitation lens, i think it's a violent simplification. there are more facets at play than opportunism, if that even was a conscious motive of either.

but obviously padraig knows this, it was mostly a quip about him being stuck on the same note, resorting to the same line of argument
 

luka

Well-known member
when i met you you were talking about all the girls you had sex with so assumed you were. sorry if i got that wrong
 

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
I would agree with luke that Bowie wasn't just using queerness or black music or etc to promote himself

at the same time he undeniably used both as stepping stones

where you want to draw the exploitation/influence line is up for debate

I can't speak to his personal motivations - like anyone's I assume they were complicated

certainly, he situationally deployed ambiguous sexuality to further his career and then dropped it when it was no longer helpful

he's on better ground with black music i.e. that famous clip of him calling out early 80s MTV for not playing enough black artists
 
Top